A pattern analysis drawn from 95 lived accounts. These are not edge cases – they are the norm. Every pattern here has a legal implication and a practical remedy.
Jobs lost on average across a working life – not a single incident
8 yrs
Average diagnostic delay – during which women receive disciplinary warnings for medical absences
⅔
of endometriosis' total cost is lost work productivity – not healthcare. The failure lands in working life, not the clinic
The RTO debate, turned on its head
She doesn't perform despite flexibility – she performs because she gets it.
The loss doesn't happen when she's away. It happens when she shows up and pushes through the pain at half capacity. The answer isn't stricter attendance – it's autonomy over when and where.
23.2 days
of productivity lost per year working through menstrual pain (presenteeism). Absence: just 1.3 days.
And the number leadership can't explain away: 63% of executives whose companies mandated a return to office admit it drove a disproportionate number of women to quit – 62% now struggle to replace them, 57% say productivity fell. The mandate is set overwhelmingly by men: in US big business, 89% of chief executives are men.
Flexibility is not a concession to the sick. It is how a system keeps experienced people and draws out the performance they already want to give. Rigid attendance does the opposite – it burns out precisely those who show up regardless.
The evidence base
This is not anecdote. It is a documented, measurable failure.
The lived accounts on this page sit on top of a research record built across three
scopes. What girls and women describe in their own words is exactly what the peer-reviewed
and public evidence predicts.
Norway · national scopeEstablished
The 2025 public inquiry into women's health
(NOU 2023:5) and the Directorate of Health's review of care for women with
endometriosis both document delayed diagnosis and inadequate follow-up as
systemic, not individual, failures.12
Sources: NOU 2023:5; Helsedirektoratet.
EuropeEstablished
Eurofound and the European Patients' Forum document that people with
chronic conditions face reduced ability to stay in work and a widespread lack of workplace
accommodation — a labour-market problem, not a personal one.34
Sources: Eurofound (2019); European Patients' Forum.
InternationalEstablished
Multi-country studies quantify the cost of endometriosis: the
largest share of its total economic burden comes from lost work productivity, not
direct healthcare spending, and is measurable across ten-country cohorts.56
Sources: Soliman et al. (2017); Nnoaham et al. (2011).
The missing number is a purchase order, not a gap.
Norway's own public inquiry calls for the national cost data on women's health to be produced.
When authorities ask for the figure, the absence of that figure is a commission — and TrustHer
is built to deliver it.1
Eight patterns. Every one preventable.
8 themes · ranked by prevalence
01
Job Loss as the Default Outcome
Prevalence: high
Women with chronic conditions routinely lose jobs – not once, but repeatedly across their careers – due to illness-related absences that employers treat as conduct failures rather than medical circumstances.
I've lost 4 jobs. 4. I'm in a probationary period at my current part-time job, and I just had laparoscopic surgery to remove endometriosis 2 weeks ago after 4 trips to the emergency room in a month.Original · engelskI've lost 4 jobs. 4. I'm in a probationary period at my current part-time job, and I just had laparoscopic surgery to remove endometriosis 2 weeks ago after 4 trips to the emergency room in a month.
Yes, I have lost so many jobs over the years due to my endo and now 47 and just lost another one, endo has ruined my life – can't have kids, lost my husband and lost jobs that I loved.Original · engelskYes, I have lost so many jobs over the years due to my endo and now 47 and just lost another one, endo has ruined my life – can't have kids, lost my husband and lost jobs that I loved.
Employer implication
Repeat dismissals across multiple employers signal a structural gap – not individual underperformance. When a worker loses 4–5 jobs for the same medical reason, absence policies are functioning as termination mechanisms. Employers lose experienced staff and absorb recruitment costs when the underlying cause is manageable with flexibility.
Legal exposure
Disability discrimination law in most jurisdictions requires employers to consider whether a condition qualifies as a disability and to make reasonable adjustments before dismissal. A pattern of absence-triggered dismissals without adjustment assessment exposes employers to discrimination claims.
02
Pain Dismissed, Conduct Penalised
Prevalence: high
Employers respond to symptoms by issuing formal warnings for attendance, while the underlying medical cause is either unknown, disbelieved, or treated as irrelevant to the disciplinary process.
I was told my condition makes me unreliable. It's so hard trying to get someone who doesn't understand the full body pain we go through to even begin to wrap their head around it.Original · engelskI was told my condition makes me unreliable. It's so hard trying to get someone who doesn't understand the full body pain we go through to even begin to wrap their head around it.
I was fired because of my attendance. Every job I've had looked into it and said the same – equality act yes, disability act no – despite diagnosis. Even my GP said it's not, but should be.Original · engelskI was fired because of my attendance. Every job I've had looked into it and said the same – equality act yes, disability act no – despite diagnosis. Even my GP said it's not, but should be.
Employer implication
Attendance policies that trigger discipline without a medical assessment phase create legal exposure and destroy trust. A single welfare conversation at the point of repeated absence – rather than at the point of dismissal – would change outcomes for both the employee and the employer.
Legal exposure
Dismissing an employee for absences attributable to a disability without first conducting a reasonable adjustment assessment may constitute unlawful disability discrimination in most jurisdictions. Issuing formal warnings that count medical absences as conduct failures may also constitute less favourable treatment.
03
The Credibility Gap
Prevalence: high
Women consistently report that their pain is not believed – by employers, colleagues, and managers – requiring them to perform wellness while visibly suffering and to justify absences they should not have to justify.
The hardest part of endometriosis isn't the pain itself. It's the endless battle to convince others that the pain is real.Original · engelskThe hardest part of endometriosis isn't the pain itself. It's the endless battle to convince others that the pain is real.
I was sent to the ER by employers on numerous occasions only to be sent home with an informational pamphlet on what a menstrual cycle is like – I haven't had one for the past 17 years.Original · engelskI was sent to the ER by employers on numerous occasions only to be sent home with an informational pamphlet on what a menstrual cycle is like – I haven't had one for the past 17 years.
Employer implication
The credibility gap is a design flaw in how workplaces receive medical information. Structured absence protocols that route to occupational health rather than requiring employees to justify themselves to line managers reduce this harm – and the legal exposure that comes with it.
Legal exposure
Creating or permitting an environment where an employee is ridiculed for symptoms of a medical condition may constitute harassment related to disability. This obligation extends to the acts of colleagues, not only managers.
04
Career Downgrade as Survival Strategy
Prevalence: high
Women who cannot sustain formal employment systematically downgrade their careers – moving from skilled roles to gig work, part-time positions, or self-employment – to maintain any income while managing unpredictable symptoms.
I've lost a number of jobs, which has pushed me into zero-hour contracts so I'm not as vulnerable to being let go during flare-ups. Although the flexibility helps, the unpredictability makes it very difficult to consistently cover my bills.Original · engelskI've lost a number of jobs, which has pushed me into zero-hour contracts so I'm not as vulnerable to being let go during flare-ups. Although the flexibility helps, the unpredictability makes it very difficult to consistently cover my bills.
I've been waiting two years for surgery and had to stop working full-time – transitioning from working my dream career to settling for anything that will pay the bills. One of my least favourite parts of all this.Original · engelskI've been waiting two years for surgery and had to stop working full-time – transitioning from working my dream career to settling for anything that will pay the bills. One of my least favourite parts of all this.
Employer implication
Talent lost through zero-hours displacement or forced self-employment doesn't appear in turnover statistics – but represents a measurable loss of experienced workers who had both the skills and the will to stay. Flexible arrangements are the difference between retaining people and losing them to the gig economy.
Legal exposure
Where an employee is effectively forced to resign or move to a less secure arrangement because an employer has failed to make reasonable adjustments, this may constitute constructive dismissal.
05
Mental Health as a Secondary Casualty
Prevalence: high
The psychological cost of managing chronic illness at work – guilt, anxiety, shame, and loss of professional identity – is as disabling as the physical symptoms and is rarely acknowledged as part of the occupational health picture.
Nobody fired me but I preferred to quit because I understood that I was just a burden for the team and it's not fair.Original · engelskNobody fired me but I preferred to quit because I understood that I was just a burden for the team and it's not fair.
Nobody realises the hardship of having to stop working because of this and what that alone does to a person. Changes your whole life, how you see yourself, what you're capable of, the life you dreamed of having.Original · engelskNobody realises the hardship of having to stop working because of this and what that alone does to a person. Changes your whole life, how you see yourself, what you're capable of, the life you dreamed of having.
Employer implication
Employees managing chronic conditions in indifferent work environments develop anxiety and depression that compounds their physical condition. This secondary harm creates longer absences and lower recovery prospects. Proactive welfare check-ins – not performative ones – are a measurable protective factor.
Legal exposure
Employers have a general duty of care for employee psychological wellbeing. Where an employer's conduct materially contributes to psychiatric injury, claims under negligence and stress-at-work case law may arise. Women with endometriosis are 2–3× more likely to develop depression when social support is absent.
06
Post-Surgery Abandonment
Prevalence: medium
Women who undergo surgery are routinely pushed back into full duties before recovery is complete, or dismissed during surgical leave – transforming a medical intervention into an employment crisis.
I received no help when I had surgery – was expected back to work full-time on 12-hour shifts just 3 weeks post-surgery. Lost that job. Started a new one and lost that one too last week.Original · engelskI received no help when I had surgery – was expected back to work full-time on 12-hour shifts just 3 weeks post-surgery. Lost that job. Started a new one and lost that one too last week.
I was off for two months then asked for a phased return. My former boss kept making up excuses and just didn't bother letting me know about my job – or telling me I was sacked.Original · engelskI was off for two months then asked for a phased return. My former boss kept making up excuses and just didn't bother letting me know about my job – or telling me I was sacked.
Employer implication
Phased return protocols after surgery reduce long-term absence. Forcing full-duty returns too early increases re-injury risk and extends recovery time. The cost of a phased return is substantially less than the cost of a second dismissal and re-hire cycle.
Legal exposure
Failing to offer a phased return when recommended by a clinician may constitute failure to make reasonable adjustments. Dismissal during sick leave related to surgery may be automatically unfair in jurisdictions that protect employees during sickness absence.
07
The Late Diagnosis Trap
Prevalence: medium
The average 8-year diagnostic delay means women suffer disciplinary consequences for absences caused by an unrecognised condition – losing jobs before they have the medical documentation that might have protected them.
I even don't have a diagnosis and I lost the job because of my pain.Original · engelskI even don't have a diagnosis and I lost the job because of my pain.
10 years with endo, just now got diagnosed. Unfortunately no idea what was going with my body – always with big guilt about why I am always tired and weak.Original · engelsk10 years with endo, just now got diagnosed. Unfortunately no idea what was going with my body – always with big guilt about why I am always tired and weak.
Employer implication
Absence policies that require formal diagnosis before triggering protection leave workers without recourse during the diagnostic phase – which can last a decade. A welfare-led approach that responds to reported symptoms and functional limitations, rather than a diagnostic label, protects both parties.
Legal exposure
Disability discrimination law in several jurisdictions protects employees from the point symptoms have a substantial and long-term adverse effect on daily activities – not from the point of formal diagnosis. Employers who wait for a diagnosis before engaging may already be in breach.
08
The Accommodation Gap
Prevalence: medium
When women do request adjustments – flexible hours, remote work, occupational health referrals – they are frequently ignored, delayed, or offered nominal support that does not match clinical recommendations.
I requested reasonable accommodations and my doctor was working on FMLA paperwork when I was 'terminated effective immediately,' with no actual cause given.Original · engelskI requested reasonable accommodations and my doctor was working on FMLA paperwork when I was 'terminated effective immediately,' with no actual cause given.
I worked for a large employer! They even went against occupational health recommendations. Yes you can take this to court and probably win – but you need the strength, the energy, and the money for a good solicitor.Original · engelskI worked for a large employer! They even went against occupational health recommendations. Yes you can take this to court and probably win – but you need the strength, the energy, and the money for a good solicitor.
Employer implication
The gap between requesting an accommodation and receiving one is where most legal risk concentrates. Occupational health referral at the point of a request – not at the point of dismissal – is the minimum expected standard. The most effective adjustments (flexible hours, remote working, appointment attendance) are low cost.
Legal exposure
The obligation to make reasonable adjustments is a positive duty. Employers cannot wait for employees to make a formal legal complaint before considering adjustments. Ignoring or rejecting accommodation requests without documented assessment may be treated by employment tribunals as evidence of discrimination.
Why it happens
The harm of not being believed has a name.
The patterns above are not random cruelty. They are the predictable result of documented
mechanisms — each one named and studied in research. Naming the mechanism is the first step
to holding a system to account for it.
Epistemic injustice
Established
Being wronged specifically as a knower. When a woman's account of her
own body is discounted because of who she is, she is denied credibility as a source of
knowledge — the core of Miranda Fricker's account of testimonial injustice.7
In the UK Women's Health Strategy call for evidence,
84% of respondents reported that they were not listened to by healthcare
professionals.17
Applied to illness, it explains why patients are systematically not believed
about pain and symptoms they alone can feel.89
Maps to010305
Fricker (2007); Carel & Kidd (2014); de Souza Campos & De Luca-Noronha (2025); UK Women's Health Strategy (2022).
Illness invalidation
Established
The measurable experience of having a condition denied or minimised by
others — including clinicians, employers and family. It is distinct enough to have its own
validated measurement scale.10
A systematic review of pain invalidation synthesised
431 articles covering more than 7,770 participants, identifying five recurring
themes of how patients are disbelieved.11
Invalidation is independently associated with worse mental-health outcomes for
patients living with chronic pain.12
Maps to030406
Kool et al. (2010); pain-invalidation review, J Pain (2022); Woldhuis & Gandy (2024).
Institutional betrayal
Established
Harm caused by the very institution a person depends on and trusts —
when a school, employer or health system fails to prevent or respond to a wrong it had a
duty to address. Jennifer Freyd's research shows this failure compounds the original harm.13
The counterpart, institutional courage, is the researched
antidote: an institution that acts to protect the person instead of protecting itself.14
Maps to010207
Smith & Freyd (2014); Smidt, Adams-Clark & Freyd (2023).
Gendered pain & disclosure risk
Established
Women's pain is systematically taken less seriously than men's, and more
readily attributed to psychological rather than physical causes — a documented bias in how
pain is assessed and treated.15
This makes disclosure itself a risk: research on endometriosis
at work shows women weighing the cost of disclosing against the cost of staying silent.16
Stigma keeps the conditions hidden and diagnosis delayed.18
Maps to040506
Samulowitz et al. (2018); endometriosis workplace-disclosure study (2021); Endometriosis UK.
Every pattern on this page traces to a named mechanism
Epistemic injustice — not believed as a knower
010305
Illness invalidation — condition denied or minimised
030406
Institutional betrayal — failed by a trusted institution
010207
Gendered pain & disclosure risk — believed less, silenced more
040506
Directly from the women
This is what they ask employers for.
Not our recommendations — theirs. Aggregated, anonymously, from
women who lived it and told us what would have kept them in work. Counts shown only
where enough women have said the same thing to protect every individual.
Sector by sector
What it looks like in your sector.
The picture forms one sector at a time. What women in
your field carry at work — the shifts they can't call in sick from, the appointments they
hide, the flexibility they never ask for — is not the same as the sector next door. As enough
women in a sector tell us, what they say appears here. Until then, this is where you add yours.
Safe and private. Always anonymous — you decide what you share.
Thank you for sharing.
Want to tell the whole story?A short note is a pulse. The whole story — what happened, and how you were met — is what becomes documentation employers must answer to. We take you through a few simple questions, at your pace.
Accounts are always anonymous. Figures for a sector are shown only once
enough women in it have spoken to protect every individual — never before.
A shared cause
You can be part of the fix.
This page documents a failure — but employers are not the adversary. The ones who choose to
act become allies in a women's-health movement, not defendants in it. Getting this right is not
only compliance and retained talent; it is a stand on something that has gone unaddressed for
generations.
You need one decision: to believe her, and to make it safe to speak up.
≈1 in 10
women of reproductive age have endometriosis alone.19 Add
PMDD, PCOS, adenomyosis, bladder pain and ME/CFS — and someone on almost every team is carrying
this, often in silence. This is not a rare edge case. It is a tenth of the women you employ.
Culture is set from the top
It starts at the top.
Most of this page is about the relationship between an employee and her manager. But
whether that relationship is safe is decided higher up. Leadership sets the culture — and the
single most protective thing a company can say, out loud, is that seeing a doctor is never a
problem. When that comes from the top, no one has to spend courage asking permission to be ill.
Normalise care
Going to the doctor is never a problem
Say it as policy, not as a favour. When leadership states plainly that medical
appointments are expected and unremarkable, attending one stops being a negotiation — and stops
costing the person who is already unwell.
Plan the hard periods
Mark out periods of extra flexibility
Flare-ups, treatment cycles and recovery are predictable in shape even when the timing
is not. Agree named windows of extra flexibility in advance, so support is arranged before a
crisis — not improvised during one.
Signal safety
Disclosure depends on the climate, not her courage
Whether a woman feels able to say what she needs is set by the signals leaders send long
before she asks. A visibly safe climate is what makes disclosure possible — the burden should never
rest on how brave she is.
The research backs this. Institutional courage — an institution deciding to
protect the person who depends on it — is a measured buffer against the harm of institutional betrayal,
and it is a leadership choice, not an individual one.14 And because
women's pain is systematically taken less seriously,15 whether
disclosure feels safe is governed by workplace climate rather than the individual's willingness to speak.16Sources 14–16 · established / emerging.
The conversation
How to talk with her about it.
You do not need a diagnosis, a policy binder or the right medical words. The conversation
itself is the first accommodation — a signal that she is believed before she has proven anything. Lead with
curiosity about what would make the workday easier, not with questions about what is wrong.
An opener that works
"I've noticed some days are heavier than others. You don't owe me an explanation — but if there's
anything that would make the workday easier, I'd genuinely like to hear it."
This helps
Believe her the first time. Take what she says at face value; she should not have to prove pain to be taken seriously.
Let her set the pace. She decides how much to share and when — disclosure is hers to control, not yours to extract.
Ask "what would make this easier?" Focus on function and the workday, not on the medical details or a label.
Keep it confidential. What she tells you stays with you unless she asks otherwise.
Follow up. Check in later without making it a big thing — steady support beats a one-off gesture.
Adjust, then keep the doors open. Arrange support for now without quietly lowering what she's trusted with next.
Try to avoid
"Everyone gets period pain." Minimising is the exact dismissal she has likely heard for years.
Requiring a diagnosis first. Support is not owed a label — waiting for one can mean years without help.
Solving it over her head. Don't announce changes or tell others without agreeing them with her first.
Turning it into a reliability question. Needing flexibility is not the same as being less committed or less capable.
Assuming it limits her ambition. A hard patch is not a ceiling — never quietly write her off a stretch role.
Making her educate everyone. The burden of explaining the condition to the whole team should not fall on her.
Being believed is the first accommodation. Everything practical follows from it. And when you
adjust, ask which doors to keep open — never what she is capable of.
For HR, Managers & Policymakers
What good looks like.
The opposite of institutional betrayal is not neutrality — it is
institutional courage: an institution that chooses to protect the person who depends
on it, even when protecting itself would be easier.14 None
of what follows requires a diagnosis, a tribunal, or a large budget. It requires a decision to
act before harm becomes irreversible.
What employees need
Flexible start and end times to manage unpredictable symptom onset
Ability to attend medical appointments without triggering formal absence processes
Remote or hybrid arrangements that reduce reliance on physical presence during flare-ups
Phased return protocols after surgery, aligned to clinical recovery timelines
A single informed contact point who does not require repeated justification
Absence counting systems that exclude medically-documented illness from disciplinary triggers
What goes wrong
Applying standard attendance policies to medical absences without assessing disability status
Issuing formal warnings before any welfare check-in has taken place
Dismissing employees while on sick leave or immediately following surgery
Allowing colleagues to minimise or ridicule an employee's condition
Waiting for a formal diagnosis before engaging with adjustment needs
Treating accommodation requests as burden rather than legal obligation
What changes outcomes
Proactive conversation at first sign of recurring absence – before any disciplinary process
Occupational health referral offered at first request, with recommendations followed up in writing
A documented adjustment plan specifying changes, duration, and review date
Attendance policies that explicitly exempt chronic condition absences from disciplinary triggers
Manager training on invisible disabilities and fluctuating conditions
Regular welfare check-ins initiated by the employer, not the employee
Career navigation
Choosing a path she can sustain.
The evidence on this page is not only a case against employers. It is also information a girl
can hold for herself. Pattern 08 — the point where an accommodation is requested and the
request decides everything — repeats across the 95 accounts behind this page. Knowing that
pattern in advance changes what she can plan for.
This is not about steering her away from anything. It is about making the invisible visible:
which environments have flexibility built in, which rights she can invoke, and which structures
protect her before she needs protecting.
The goal is never lowered ambition. It is informed ambition:
knowing which environments, structures and rights make her ambitions achievable — before the
system teaches her the hard way.
Nothing in this section may imply sorting girls into lower tracks.
Rights to accommodation come first; choices come second; ambitions stay intact.
The economic case
Believing her is the cheaper choice.
The same failure carries a price — in dropped-out schooling, lost work, and productivity worked away in silence. Believing her early isn't only the right thing. It's the cheapest.
$1→$3
Every $1 invested in women's health is estimated to return about three in economic growth.
A concise briefing built on the law and the research – the costs, the rights, and what employers are obliged to do. To read and share with HR, leadership, and occupational-health and safety reps.
Every claim on this page is linked to its original source. Lived accounts
are quoted verbatim; research is cited with its confidence level. Where a finding is still
emerging, it is labelled as such rather than presented as settled.
Nnoaham et al. (2011) — Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study.Fertil Steril.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090
Carel, H. & Kidd, I.J. (2014) — Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophical analysis.Med Health Care Philos.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9560-2
de Souza Campos & De Luca-Noronha (2025) — Misunderstanding Epistemic Injustice: The Case of Chronic Pain Reports.J Appl Philos.doi.org/10.1111/japp.70032
Kool et al. (2010) — Understanding the lack of understanding: invalidation from the perspective of the patient.Ann Rheum Dis.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.123224